In my last blog I spoke about the advantages of the gun laws in Israel versus those in America.
First off, I want to place a disclaimer on my previous statements:
I am by no means a card carrying member of the NRA, or an advocate of arming every citizen in this country. I believe that the ability to own a firearm is a right of the citizens of the United States of America, but in order to achieve the true benefits of this right, our country is replete with responsibilities. These responsibilities, include, first and foremost, the systematic and intelligent reduction (I’m not starry-eyed enough to write ‘elimintation’) of illegal firearms. But just as important, they include well-structured regulation policies, which include extensive training for all firearm owners. This training would be HEAVILY focused on firearm safety.
An advantage of my time, albeit brief, in the Iraeli army, was all the gun safety training. After one month you are trained for life never to point a gun, even if unloaded, at anyone EVER.
But that’s not the purpose of my blog today.
I had an idea and I wanted to submit it for “peer” review.
In the past several years I’ve heard many people talk about a worry that our school’s, and particularly Jewish schools, are simply not safe. Ask the average student how hard it would be for terrorists to plot a successful attack on their institution, and you’re likely to hear them ramble at length about how terribly simple it would be. The same might go for just a common criminal off the street.
My suggestion for how to reduce these problems…
(you’ll pardon my momentary sigh and gulp as I think to myself that I’ll probably get in trouble for writing this)
There need to be people, several people, who are on the premises at all times when there are students around who are specifcally trained and organized to deal with the many possible problems that could arise. Who would best suit this purpose?
The teachers.
My proposal would be to form a group of teachers (the number would depend on the size of the institution), either volunteers or receiving an extra mild salary supplement, who would be armed at all times, and would have monthly drills by security experts on plans for dealing with all sorts of tragic situations that could arise.
I imagine people at this point would have a dozen questions (problems?) on such a proposal. Luckily enough, I’ve thought of a few in advance that I’ll address:
1. I suppose the immediate reaction of many parents reading this might be, “Oh my God, my kid would get shot the very first day.”
I think it would be imperative that part of the plan requires that any teacher participating signs a contract that states that if they show the weapon unnecessarily on school property, or even make mention of it in the classroom setting, this would be a cause for immediate cessation of their role in the program and/or termination from the institution.
The weapons by necessity be concealed at all times for two reasons: a) The identities of carriers should be unknown, similar to Air Marshalls on US flights. b) It would be uncomfortable for many people in the building. I believe quality security could exist without extreme inconvenience (Yes, I hate the modern US airport). The program would not serve to change anything in any way except for making the school a safer place.
2. Someone might worry that such a plan might be entirely ineffectual. Could we really expect a few trained teachers to stand up to several terrorists? Within this lies the true secret to this or any other security program. Potential attackers must know of the existence of the program, and know which institutions are utilizing it.
Can a car thief steal a locked car that has an alarm, a Club, and VIN etchings? If he’s pretty good, most certainly. If two cars are sitting next to each other, one with all of these features, and one with none of them, which one does the thief choose?
Simply having the features serves as a major deterrent, which is the real essence of security in the first place. Research has shown that simply having a sign in front of your house for a security company serves to keep away house thieves, even if you have no such system.
Any terrorist wishes to succeed. If they enter the school knowing there’s only one security guard making occasional rounds, the school is a sitting duck. If they enter the school knowing there are several people scattered throughout the institution who are armed and trained, and who know the building better than they do, maybe they’ll think twice before they enter to damage.
We get to send the message: “Stay out!” If even one person in the next one hundred years DID NOT attack an institution because he heard the message loud and clear, wouldn’t this all be worth it?
…
I’m young. I make mistakes every day of my life. But as far as I’m concerned there are minimal drawbacks to such a program, if any. I’m really curious what others have to say, so if you read this, please tell me your opinion.